Income Tax Changes:
The much touted income tax reduction is a very slow reduction in the tax rate. In 2001 the tax bracket is cut
by 0.5% and the child credit increased by $100. Big deal.
Actually, the first $6,000 of taxable income for a single person ($12,000 for a married couple), gets a 5% reduction worth $300 or $600. But above those amounts, the 2001 rate reduction is 0.5%.
If you make a million, the 0.5% cut is worth $50,000. A rate reduction obviously saves money for taxpayers; the more
you make the more you save.
So if you made $6,000 ($12,000, if married) or more (taxable) last year, your tax was at least $300 ($600 if
married) last year. If you make the same amount this year, your tax will be at least $300 ($600 if married)
less this year.
The politicians thought about this and figured that if they issued advance tax refunds we would reelect
them, after we rush out and spend our $300 / $600 checks, stimulating the economy and creating world
peace.
Getting an advance refund of $300 seems more exciting than the reality of the $6 per week it works out to.
That would almost pay for lunch once a week.
Here are the details:
The individual income tax rate drops the lowest rate to 10% from the old 15% bracket, effective retroactively
to January 1, 2001. The 10% rate applies to the first $6,000 of taxable income for single filers, the first
$10,000 for heads of households, and the first $12,000 for joint filers. Since this new rate is five percentage
points less than the former lowest rate, and applies retroactively, the effect will be to reduce individual
federal income tax for 2001 by a maximum of $300 for single filers (5% of $6,000), $500 for heads of
households (5% of $10,000), and $600 for joint filers (5% of $12,000).
So if you made at least $6,000 (single) or $12,000 (joint) taxable income, you will get these refunds.
The whole idea, small as it is, makes some sense if you got a refund (or "broke even") this past April 15.
But what if you owed last April? Are they going to send you an advance refund? If they send it, it means
you will owe an extra $300 / $600 this coming April 15!!
Phased-in Individual Income Tax Rate Cuts
Besides creating the new 10% bracket, Congress reduced the other tax brackets, beginning after June 30,
2001. The wage withholding tables will be revised accordingly.
The initial reduction will be one percentage point. Thus, the 39.6% rate will be reduced to 38.6%, the 36%
rate to 35%, the 31% rate to 30%, and the 28% rate to 27%.
But since this is effective mid-year, it really means a half-point drop for the year as a whole.
Further reductions are to occur in succeeding years. Finally, in 2006, the tax brackets are to be 10%,
15%,25%,28%,33%, and 35%. Unless they change the law before then!
These reductions do not help taxpayers in the AMT.
Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) Relief for Individuals
The legislation provides temporary , but immediate, relief from the individual alternative minimum tax (AMT)
by increasing the exemption to $49,000 for joint filers (a $4,000 increase), $24,500 for married taxpayers
filing separately (a $2,000 increase), and $35,750 for other individuals (a $2,000 increase) in 2001 through
2004.
This saves married AMT Taxpayers about $1,000.
Other provisions in this legislation, although not directly affecting the AMT, eliminate its adverse impact on
the child tax credit, the adoption credit, and the earned income credit.
Tax Benefits Relating to Children
The new law covers four broad areas relating to children. Only 1 is worthy of note:
Child Tax Credit. 2001 increase = $100. The legislation retroactively increases the child tax credit for
2001 from $500 per child to $600 per child. The $600 limit is to apply through 2004, then increase in small
steps until reaching $1,000 in 2010.
Also provided are:
Adoption Expenses. The legislation permanently extends both the adoption credit and the exclusion for
employer-provided adoption assistance, which were scheduled to expire after this year, and increases the
maximum amount of each from $5,000 to $10,000. Perhaps more important for many taxpayers, however,
is that it raises the income level at which the benefits begin to be phased out to $150,000 (versus $75,000
in 2001).
Dependent Care Credit. The legislation also provides more generous dependent care credit limitations that
will increase the maximum credit for many taxpayers, but these provisions do not take effect until 2003.
Marriage Penalty Relief
The new law also promises relief from the "marriage penalty," but most affected taxpayers will have to wait
until 2005 to benefit.
One provision will increase the standard deduction for joint filers by making it twice the amount available to
single filers. Another provision will stretch the 15% bracket for joint filers to twice the size for single
taxpayers, thus taxing a greater portion of joint filers' income at 15% before subjecting their remaining
income to higher rates. These provisions will not begin to take effect, however, until 2005. The standard
deduction provision is to be phased in over a five-year period and the 15% bracket increase over a four-year
period.
A provision that will begin to take effect in 2002 (and be fully phased in after 2007) will increase the earned
income credit (EIC) available to joint filers by increasing the earned income phase-out amount. Another
provision taking effect in 2002 will simplify the EIC computation.
A more targeted "marriage penalty"-related provision, which also takes effect in 2002, increases the
income phase out range to permit more joint filers to qualify for "Education IRAs," discussed below.
Education Provisions
The new law contains several education-related benefits, most of which will go
into effect next year. Here's a brief summary.
Education IRAs. Beginning in 2002, the legislation significantly expands and liberalizes the "Education IRA"
provisions.
- The most notable change is an expanded definition of tax-free "qualified education
expenses," formerly limited to post-secondary education, that includes similar expenses (e.g., tuition) for
attending elementary and secondary schools. The new law also:
- Increases the annual contribution limit to $2,000 per beneficiary (from $500); and
- Increases the phase out range for joint filers to twice the amount for singles, thus making the phase-out
range $190,000 to $220,000 of "modified adjusted gross income."
Qualified Tuition Plans. Also effective in 2002, the legislation contains several provisions liberalizing the
rules governing these plans, including a provision that allows funds to be rolled over from one plan to
another plan maintained for the same beneficiary .The new law also extends this program, currently
restricted to state-sponsored plans, to educational institutions (which may be private institutions) meeting
certain requirements. Tax-free distributions from private plans, however, will not be available until 2004.
Also, tuition credits or certificates will be available from private plans, but such plans will not be able to
receive contributions to a savings account.
Employer Provided Educational Assistance. The legislation makes the exclusion, which was scheduled to
expire at the end of this year, permanent, and extends the exclusion to graduate level courses beginning
after December 31, 2001.
Student Loan Interest Deduction. Beginning in 2002, the new law:
Above-the-Line Deduction for Qualified Higher Education Expenses. Under this temporary provision,
applicable from 2002 through 2005, eligible taxpayers can deduct "qualified tuition and related expenses,"
as defined for purposes of the HOPE credit, without having to itemize or be subject to the "miscellaneous
itemized deductions" limitation. The maximum deduction is $3,000 in 2002 and 2003 and is limited to
taxpayers having adjusted gross incomes (as specially defined) of up to $65,000, or, for joint filers,
$130,000.
Remember, further changes in the rules are almost a certainty.
"Sunset" in 2011? One final aspect of the legislation merits comment. Technically, the changes made
by the new law will cease to apply after 2010! This highly unusual
provision was included to insure technical compliance with the federal budget law. The lawmakers
obviously assume that this provision will be eliminated in future legislation.