|
Copyright 2003, Marc S. Weissman Certified Specialist: Estate Planning, Trust and Probate Law Certified by the California Board of Legal Specialization of The State Bar of California Weiss & Weissman, San Francisco, California (650) 574-0362 To Contact us: email Phone/Fax/Mail Homepage |
|
Return to Home Seller Article Return to Newsletter Directory Return to Tax Directory Return to Real Estate Directory Return to Home Page |
The original law is §121 of the Tax Code. The new Regs are 1.121- 1, etc.
To recap, the law requires that you:
The law applies to a Principal Residence. That is now defined, kind of.
If you have more than 1 Residence, the determination of which is your Principal Residence depends on all of the facts. Most important is in which property you spend a majority of your time. Additional factors include but are not limited to: place of employment; abode of immediate family members; address for government purposes (tax filing, DMV, voting); mailing address for bills and correspondence; location of banks; location of clubs and religious organizations.
There is much discussion in the Regs about whether vacant land adjacent to the Residence qualifies for the exclusion. IRS Example: Clara owns a house on 10 acres; she sells 8 acres to Bob and next year the house and 2 acres to Sam. Clara can treat both sales as if they were 1 sale at the same time, excluding up to $250,000 of gain.
[I don't expect this to apply to many readers, but it illustrates how friendly an approach the IRS has taken with these Regs.]
Use does not have to be concurrent with ownership: Tom likes his rental so much he buys it after living there 2 years. Then he moves out and turns it into a rental. After 2 years, he qualifies, even though his use was before his ownership.
We thought the only solution was to discontinue using the home office for 2 years before the sale. (That would work to qualify the entire $200,000 profit for the exclusion, but there would still be depreciation recapture.)
Back to the example: My $200,000 profit is excluded. (I still have depreciation recapture of $30,000.
IRS Example: A duplex: one-half is rented, one-half used by the Owner. The portion of profit attributable to the rental does not qualify for the home sale exclusion.
IRS Example: A duplex: one-half is rented, one-half used by the Owner. Then Owner merges the 2 into 1 unit; lives there 2 years more; all of the profit is eligible for the exclusion. (There is still depreciation recapture.)
IRS Example 5: H dies 2/1/2003. W sells 11/1/2003, the same year. W may file Jointly (with her dead H) and exclude $500,000. [Of course, IRS neglected to mention the step-up in basis which eliminates all / most of the profit.]
IRS Example 6: H dies 2/1/2003. W sells 1/2004, the next year. She may NOT file Jointly and may exclude only $250,000. [Of course, IRS neglected to mention the step-up in basis which eliminates all / most of the profit.]
IRS Example: H, a newly-wed, dies. W inherits. She is treated as living and owning the property for the entire time H owned and lived there.
IRS Example: H divorces. W gets the home. She is treated as living and owning the property for the entire time H owned and lived there.
IRS has also issued Temporary Proposed Regs regarding the Reduced Exclusion (Proportional Rule) if you do not meet the 2 year tests.
All of these Regs may be applied retroactively.
|
Return to Home Seller Article Return to Tax Directory Return to Real Estate Directory Return to Home Page |